APP Users: If unable to download, please re-install our APP.
Only logged in User can create notes
Only logged in User can create notes

General Studies 3 >> Science & Technology

audio may take few seconds to load

CARBON DATING

CARBON DATING

 

Why in the News?

A Varanasi court allowed a petition seeking carbon dating of the structure inside the Gyanvapi mosque that the Hindu side has claimed as Shivling


1. About

  • Carbon dating is a widely-used method to establish the age of organic materials, things that were once living. Living things have carbon in them in various forms. 
  • The dating method is based on the fact that C14, an isotope of carbon with an atomic mass of 14, is radioactive, and decays at a well-known rate. 
  • The Most Abundant isotope of carbon in the atmosphere is carbon-12.
  • A very small amount of C-14 is also present. 
  • The Ratio Of C-12 to C-14 in the atmosphere is almost static and is known. 
  • Plants get their carbon through photosynthesis; animals get it mainly through food. 
  • Because plants and animals get their carbon from the atmosphere, they too acquire C-12 and C-14 in roughly the same proportion as is available in the atmosphere. 
  • When they die, their interactions with the atmosphere stop.
  • While C-12 is stable,the radioactive C-14 reduces to half of itself in about 5,730 years—known as its half-life. 
  • The Changing ratio of C-12 to C-14 in the mains of a plant or animal after it dies can be measured and can be used to deduce the approximate time when the organism died.

2. Carbon dating in case of abiotic components

  • Though extremely effective, carbon dating cannot be applied in all circumstances. 
  • It cannot be used to determine the age of non-living things like rocks, for example. Also, the age of things that are more than 40,000-50,000 years old cannot be arrived at through carbon dating. This is because, after 8-10 cycles of half-lives, the amount of C-14 becomes almost undetectable. 
  • There are other methods to calculate the age of inanimate things, many of which are based on the same principle as carbon dating. Instead of carbon, decays of other radioactive elements that might be present in the material become the basis for the dating method. These are known Radiometric dating methods. Many of these involve elements with half-lives of billions of years, which enables scientists to reliably estimate the age of very old objects. Twocommonlyemployedmethodsfor dating rocks are potassium-argon dating and uranium-thorium-lead dating.
  • The Radioactive Isotope Of Potassium Decays into argon, and their ratio scan gives a clue about the age of rocks.
  • Uranium And Thorium Have several radioactive isotopes, and all of them decay into the stable lead atom. 
  • The ratios of these elements present in the material can be measured and used to make estimates about age. 
  • There are also methods to determine how long an object has remained exposed to sunlight. 
  • These apply different techniques, but are again based on radioactive decay and are particularly useful in studying buried objects or changes in topology. 
  • The most common of these is called cosmogenic nuclide dating, or CRN, and is regularly applied to study the age of ice cores in polar regions. In some situations, carbon dating can be used indirectly as well. 
  • For example, a way in which the age of ice cores glaciers, and polar regions can be determined is by studying carbon dioxide molecules trapped inside large ice sheets. 
  • The trapped molecules have no interaction with the outside atmosphere and are found in the same state as when they were trapped. Determining their age gives a rough estimate of the time when the ice sheets were formed. 
  • How long a rock has been at a particular place can also be determined similarly— organic materials like dead plants or insects trapped underneath a given indication of when that rock reached that place

3. Carbon dating in Gyanvapi mosque dispute

  • While the petitioners have specifically sought carbon dating, any method that certains the date of the structure would suffice.
  • In this case, the petitioners' purpose is likely to be served if it is established that the structure existed at that place before the mosque came up. 
  • But there are specific limitations. The structure cannot be uprooted or disrupted, some methods like looking for trapped organic material beneath it might not be feasible. 
  • There are other possible solutions. 
  • Stylistic comparisons of artifacts like a Shivling are a good way to determine the period to which it belongs. 
  • Temples and idols usually follow distinctive styles of the period and place where they are situated. 
  • Archaeological excavations in the vicinity can also reveal clues to the period it belongs.
Youtube:

Share to Social