UNIFORM CIVIL CODE (UCC)
- Underlining that the Uniform Civil Code is “neither necessary nor desirable at this stage”, the 21st Law Commission of India, in 2018, argued for reform of family laws of every religion through amendments and codification of certain aspects so as to make them gender-just
- In its ‘Consultation Paper on Family Law Reforms’, the Law Commission took a stand in favour of “equality ‘within communities’ between men and women” (personal law reform), “rather than ‘equality between’ communities” (UCC)
- According to the 22nd Law Commission Cultural diversity cannot be compromised to the extent that our urge for uniformity itself becomes a reason for threat to the territorial integrity of the nation
- women must be guaranteed their freedom of faith without any compromise on their right to equality
- A UCC would provide for one law for the entire country, applicable to all religious communities, in their personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption etc
- Currently, Indian personal law is fairly complex, with each religion adhering to its own specific laws
- Separate laws govern Hindus including Sikhs, Jains and Buddhist, Muslims, Christians, and followers of other religions
- Moreover, there is diversity even within communities. All Hindus of the country are not governed by one law, nor are all Muslims or all Christians
- For instance, in the Northeast, there are more than 200 tribes with their own varied customary laws
- The Constitution itself protects local customs in Nagaland. Similar protections are enjoyed by Meghalaya and Mizoram. Even reformed Hindu law, in spite of codification, protects customary practices
- The exception to this rule is the state of Goa, where all religions have a common law regarding marriages, divorces, and adoption
- Article 44 of the Constitution lays down that the state shall endeavour to secure a UCC for citizens throughout the territory of India
- Article 44 is among the Directive Principles of State Policy. Directive Principles are not enforceable by court, but are supposed to inform and guide governance
- However, in some senses, Article 44 is unique in this manner. While Article 44 uses the words “state shall endeavour”, other Articles in the ‘Directive Principles’ chapter use words such as “in particular strive”; “shall in particular direct its policy”; “shall be obligation of the state
- The phrase “by suitable legislation” is absent in Article 44. All this implies that the duty of the state is greater in other directive principles than in Article 44
- Article 25 lays down an individual’s fundamental right to religion; Article 26(b) upholds the right of each religious denomination or any section thereof to “manage its own affairs in matters of religion”
- Article 29 defines the right to conserve distinctive culture
- An individual’s freedom of religion under Article 25 is subject to “public order, health, morality” and other provisions relating to fundamental rights, but a group’s freedom under Article 26 has not been subjected to other fundamental rights
|
For Prelims: Unifrom Civil Code (UCC), DPSP, Fundamental rights, Law Commission
For Mains: 1. What is the Uniform Civil Code? What are the challenges in implementing a Uniform Civil Code in a diverse country like India?
|
|
Previous Year Questions
Q1. Consider the following provisions under the Directive Principles of State Policy as enshrined in the Constitution of India: (2012)
Which of the above are the Gandhian Principles that are reflected in the Directive Principles of State Policy? (a) 1, 2 and 4 only Answer (b) 2. A legislation that confers on the executive or administrative authority an unguided and uncontrolled discretionary power in the matter of the application of law violates which one of the following Articles of the Constitution of India? Answer (a) Mains 1.Discuss the possible factors that inhibit India from enacting for its citizens a uniform civil code as provided for in the Directive Principles of State Policy. (2015) |
LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGREEMENT (LSA)
- Logistics Support Agreements (LSAs) are basic defence cooperation arrangements between countries that facilitate the mutual use of military facilities such as bases and ports for refuelling, repairs, replenishment, and other logistical requirements.
- These agreements are primarily administrative in nature and specify the circumstances under which such support may be extended, including joint military exercises, training activities, naval port visits, humanitarian assistance, and disaster relief operations.
- With growing military-to-military engagement and strategic partnerships, LSAs help streamline procedures and minimise bureaucratic hurdles.
- For example, India and the United States signed the Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement (LEMOA) in 2016, which was India’s first logistics support pact of this kind.
- The agreement establishes a framework for reciprocal access to logistics, supplies, and services during activities such as joint exercises, training programmes, and humanitarian or disaster relief missions.
- Clarifying the scope of the agreement, then Minister of State for Defence Subhash Bhamre informed Parliament in February 2017 that LEMOA does not permit the establishment of military bases or any permanent basing arrangements.
- Some exaggerated interpretations suggest that logistics agreements allow countries to station troops on each other’s territory.
- Applying this logic, it is sometimes argued that if India and Russia could deploy forces on each other’s soil, India and the United States could do the same under LEMOA. However, such claims are incorrect.
- As clarified by the Defence Ministry, logistics support agreements merely facilitate logistical cooperation and do not authorise the permanent deployment or stationing of troops, a principle that applies to all LSA
- Similar to other logistics support arrangements, the Reciprocal Exchange of Logistics Support (RELOS) agreement lays down the framework for providing assistance to military units, facilitating port visits by naval vessels, enabling the use of airspace and airfield infrastructure by military aircraft, and organising logistical and technical support for warships, aircraft, and other military equipment of both countries.
- The agreement was concluded in Moscow on February 18, 2025, and was formally ratified after Russian President Vladimir Putin approved the corresponding federal law on December 15, 2025.
- According to the Kremlin, the pact establishes procedures governing the deployment of military contingents, naval port calls, and the use of aviation infrastructure and airspace by the armed forces of India and Russia.
- In broad terms, RELOS encompasses cooperation during joint exercises, training programmes, humanitarian assistance and disaster relief (HADR) operations, repair and maintenance facilities, medical assistance, supply of food and technical materials, and reciprocal access to military installations, including ports and airbases, to support personnel operating ships and aircraft.
- The agreement specifies an upper ceiling of 3,000 personnel, which serves as a broad limit considering the size of military contingents and the number of ships or aircraft involved in mutually agreed engagements.
- It remains in force for five years and allows for modifications in the future to accommodate evolving requirements. The duration for the deployment of personnel and equipment would depend on the nature and schedule of visits agreed upon by both countries.
- In practice, India’s defence engagements with several countries are much more extensive. For example, Indian armed forces regularly participate in exercises with the United States and other partners.
- Officials have clarified that RELOS does not provide for the permanent deployment of troops or military assets.
- Its provisions are intended to be implemented only during agreed activities such as joint exercises, port visits, or other mutually approved engagements. No arrangement for permanent or long-term stationing forms part of the agreement.
- A notable feature of RELOS is that it grants India access to Russian military facilities in the Arctic region.
- This assumes greater significance as both countries seek to deepen cooperation in the Arctic, particularly in view of emerging navigation routes made increasingly accessible by climate change and global warming
- The Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement (LEMOA) is a bilateral logistics support arrangement signed between India and the United States in 2016.
- It establishes a framework that enables the armed forces of both countries to access each other’s military facilities for refuelling, replenishment, repairs, and other logistical requirements on a reciprocal basis.
- The agreement is intended to facilitate cooperation during joint military exercises, training activities, port visits, and humanitarian assistance and disaster relief (HADR) operations.
- LEMOA simplifies administrative procedures and enhances interoperability between the two militaries by providing access to logistics supplies and services when required.
- However, the agreement does not permit the establishment of military bases or permanent basing arrangements on each other’s territory.
- This clarification was provided by the Government of India, which emphasized that the pact is purely logistical in nature and does not involve the stationing of troops or military assets.
- As one of the key foundational defence agreements between India and the United States, LEMOA has strengthened strategic cooperation and improved the ability of both countries to undertake coordinated operations and respond effectively to regional and humanitarian contingencies
India has entered into several Logistics Support Agreements (LSAs) with strategic partners such as the United States, France, Australia, Japan, Singapore, and South Korea. These arrangements facilitate reciprocal access to military facilities and enhance defence cooperation, interoperability, and maritime security.
- India–United States
As part of efforts to deepen defence relations, India and the United States have concluded three key foundational agreements:
- Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement (LEMOA), signed in 2016, enables the armed forces of both countries to access each other’s logistics infrastructure for refuelling, replenishment, maintenance, and other support services. The agreement significantly expands the operational reach of the Indian Navy. For instance, access to American facilities such as Guam enhances India's ability to sustain operations across distant waters.
- Communications Compatibility and Security Agreement (COMCASA) was concluded in 2018. It facilitates the use of secure and encrypted communication systems, thereby enabling the effective deployment of advanced military platforms, including the P-8I maritime surveillance aircraft operated by the Indian Navy.
- Basic Exchange and Cooperation Agreement (BECA), signed in November 2020, provides India with access to U.S. geospatial intelligence and satellite data. This improves the precision and targeting capability of long-range weapons and strengthens situational awareness.
- India–France
- The logistics agreement between India and France seeks to enhance strategic cooperation and contribute to peace and stability in the Indian and Pacific Oceans. It also enables closer collaboration between the two navies, including the exchange of maritime intelligence and improved operational coordination.
- India–Australia
- India and Australia signed the Mutual Logistics Support Agreement (MLSA) on June 4, 2020. Notably, it was the first bilateral agreement concluded through a virtual summit. The pact reflects the shared commitment of both countries to strengthening maritime cooperation and maintaining a free, open, and inclusive Indo-Pacific region.
- India–Japan
- In September 2020, India and Japan signed the Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreement (ACSA). The agreement facilitates reciprocal logistical support between the armed forces of the two nations and promotes closer defence cooperation in the Indo-Pacific.
- India–Singapore
- India and Singapore concluded a logistics support agreement on June 1, 2020. The arrangement covers a broad spectrum of military assets, including warships, submarines, aircraft, and shipborne helicopters, thereby enhancing naval cooperation between the two countries.
- India–South Korea
- India signed a Mutual Logistics Support Agreement with South Korea in September 2019. The agreement has expanded the operational footprint of the Indian Navy, extending its access and presence towards the northern reaches of the South China Sea and strengthening maritime engagement in East Asia.
Although the partner countries differ, the underlying framework and objectives of these arrangements remain largely identical. They are intended to facilitate joint exercises, training activities, port visits, and other forms of military cooperation by simplifying access to logistical resources and support services.
In addition, India has a logistics support arrangement with Oman, which operates within the broader framework of the bilateral defence cooperation agreement between the two countries. Together, these agreements have enhanced the operational reach of the Indian armed forces and strengthened India's strategic partnerships across different regions.
|
For Prelims: Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement (LEMOA), Logistics Support Agreement (LSA), India and Russia
For Mains: GS II - International relations
|
THE REALITY BEHIND THE FALLING OF NET FDI
India’s net FDI has declined sharply despite strong gross inflows, underlining the impact of disinvestment/capital repatriation; investor classes, modes of entry, and exit strategies can have important implications for technology transfer, industrial development, and external sustainability
2. Background of the Situation
- India’s net Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has witnessed a sharp decline over the past few years, sparking differing interpretations.
- Critics argue that the weakening net inflows reflect a deterioration in the country’s investment environment, whereas the Chief Economic Adviser maintains that robust gross FDI inflows and increasing investment in the manufacturing sector demonstrate the underlying strength of the economy.
- According to him, the subdued net FDI figures are largely the result of higher profit repatriation by foreign investors and growing overseas investments by Indian companies.
- However, this debate fails to address a more fundamental issue. By concentrating primarily on aggregate FDI figures, both perspectives overlook the evolving nature of international capital flows and the Balance of Payments (BoP) framework that determines how investment inflows and outflows are recorded and interpreted.
- For Balance of Payments accounting, net FDI is derived by subtracting outward investment and capital repatriation from total inward FDI inflows.
- India’s net FDI, which stood at a peak of $44.0 billion in 2020–21, declined dramatically to less than $1 billion in 2024–25 before recovering modestly to $7.6 billion in 2025–26.
- During the same period, gross FDI inflows reached $94.6 billion, highlighting the significant difference between gross and net investment figures.
- It is also important to understand the evolution of India’s FDI policy. When economic liberalization was introduced in 1991, the policy framework primarily sought to facilitate technology transfer, promote exports, and conserve foreign exchange reserves.
- Over time, however, the emphasis gradually shifted toward attracting larger volumes of foreign investment, while relatively less attention was paid to the long-term external payment obligations and the overall quality of investments entering the country
- Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is commonly perceived as a long-term investment that transfers technology, managerial expertise, and productive capacity to the host economy.
- In reality, however, FDI consists of different categories of investors, each characterized by distinct objectives, investment strategies, and exit horizons.
- The first category is Real Foreign Direct Investment (RFDI), which includes conventional multinational corporations possessing advanced technology, globally recognized brands, and the expertise required to establish manufacturing and service operations.
- Such investments are typically strategic in nature and involve long-term commitments to the host country.
- The second category comprises financial investors, such as private equity funds, venture capital firms, sovereign wealth funds, and institutional asset managers.
- Unlike traditional multinational enterprises, these investors primarily seek capital appreciation and generally plan to exit their investments after achieving targeted returns.
- The third category consists of diaspora investments and Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs). These investments often involve funds mobilized overseas and routed through offshore financial centres.
- In some cases, they may also include the practice of round-tripping, where Indian capital is invested abroad and subsequently reinvested into India through foreign jurisdictions.
- Data on remittance-level FDI for the four-year period from 2022–23 to December 2025–26 indicate that Real FDI accounted for approximately 41.9% of effective inflows. Financial investors contributed a comparable 40.5%, while the remaining 17.6% originated from diaspora investments and SPVs associated with India.
- The investment approach of financial investors naturally implies eventual exits, which can lead to significant capital repatriation.
- An illustrative example occurred in 2025, when Temasek of Singapore exited its investment in Schneider Electric India Ltd., reportedly earning $6.4 billion from an initial investment of $637 million made in 2020.
- During the same calendar year, total recorded divestments reached $52 billion, of which 45 major exits by foreign private equity and venture capital firms accounted for nearly $29 billion in capital outflows.
- An examination of effective FDI inflows also reveals a declining trend in investment directed toward India’s manufacturing sector over three successive four-year periods.
- Particularly noteworthy is the fact that Real FDI in manufacturing represented only 10.6% of total effective inflows during the latest four-year period, suggesting a reduced share of long-term productive investment in this crucial sector
- One significant limitation of relying on gross FDI figures is that they often combine genuine new investments with various corporate restructuring transactions.
- These include intra-group ownership transfers, mergers and acquisitions, share swaps, and the conversion of previously issued non-equity instruments, such as External Commercial Borrowings (ECBs) and convertible debentures, into equity.
- Although such transactions alter the ownership or capital structure of companies, they do not necessarily bring additional foreign capital into the Indian economy.
- As a result, gross FDI statistics may overstate the amount of fresh investment actually entering the country.
- Between 2014–15 and December 2025–26, India received approximately $560 billion in equity inflows. However, an estimated $40 billion of this total consisted of accounting and restructuring transactions rather than new capital injections.
- Consequently, these figures should be interpreted with caution when assessing the true magnitude of foreign investment.
- Moreover, a few exceptionally large corporate deals can significantly influence annual FDI numbers and sector-wise trends.
- High-value transactions involving companies such as Bosch and Meesho Technologies illustrate how individual restructuring or ownership changes can distort the overall picture of FDI inflows, even when they do not generate fresh investment for the economy
- Before examining the reasons behind India’s low or even negative net Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in certain periods, it is important to clarify a common misconception. The official argument that profit repatriation is primarily responsible for reducing net FDI can be misleading.
- According to the Balance of Payments (BoP) framework, profits remitted abroad in the form of dividends are classified as investment income under the current account.
- While these payments contribute to widening the Current Account Deficit (CAD), they do not directly affect the calculation of net FDI.
- Instead, the principal factor behind subdued net FDI is disinvestment and the repatriation of capital, both of which are recorded in the financial account of the BoP.
- Similarly, the recent rise in Outward Foreign Direct Investment (OFDI) deserves a more nuanced interpretation than simply viewing it as evidence of the growing maturity of Indian corporations.
- Between 2023–24 and 2025–26, nearly 45% of India’s outbound investment, amounting to $65 billion, was directed toward the financial, insurance, and business services (FIB) sector.
- Among the destination countries, Singapore accounted for 27% of the total, while the United Arab Emirates (UAE) received 11%.
- A substantial portion of these investments was routed to holding companies and Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) rather than directly into operational businesses.
- These multidirectional capital movements, whether through GIFT City or other offshore jurisdictions, suggest that outward FDI can represent both genuine international expansion by Indian firms and the recycling or return of previously shifted capital.
- Consequently, a rise in OFDI should not automatically be interpreted as a sign of corporate maturity alone.
- While many Indian companies invest abroad to acquire technology, resources, or global market access, some investments may involve the re-routing of capital through different jurisdictions before it eventually returns to India
- Between 2022–23 and 2025–26, India witnessed substantial FDI inflows, but these were accompanied by equally significant outflows through various current and capital account transactions.
- Although gross inward equity FDI amounted to $317.8 billion (or $230.6 billion after excluding reinvested earnings), the pattern of associated outflows presents a far more intricate picture.
- A major component of these outflows was disinvestment and capital repatriation, recorded under the capital account, which totalled $178.9 billion. These outflows were largely driven by financial investors exiting their investments through mechanisms such as secondary market sales, strategic stake sales, initial public offering (IPO) exits, and share buybacks.
- They also included Offers for Sale (OFS) by foreign promoters in companies such as Hyundai and LG. In addition, some traditional foreign investors divested their holdings, as illustrated by Wistron’s sale of its Indian operations to the Tata Group.
- Another significant outflow arose from dividend remittances, which are recorded under the current account.
- During this period, multinational enterprises (MNEs) and their affiliates transferred approximately $118.9 billion abroad as profits distributed to their parent companies, excluding the portion retained as reinvested earnings.
- Outflows were also generated through payments for intellectual property rights (IPR), including royalties and licensing fees.
- These payments, attributable to MNE subsidiaries and affiliates and estimated at $46.6 billion (assuming they constituted about 75% of total IPR payments), often serve as an alternative mechanism for transferring profits to parent entities.
- Furthermore, Indian entities collectively remitted around $250 billion toward technical, consultancy, and service-related payments.
- However, distinguishing the share attributable to foreign-owned enterprises from that of purely domestic firms remains difficult due to data limitations.
- Even after excluding Outward Foreign Direct Investment (OFDI) and payments for technical and consultancy services, the combined outflows arising from disinvestment, dividend remittances, and IPR-related payments amounted to approximately $344.4 billion
- This indicates that for every dollar of fresh foreign investment entering India (excluding reinvested earnings), nearly $1.50 flowed out through these channels.
- The trend has become increasingly pronounced over the past decade. Between 2014–15 and 2017–18, about 56 cents flowed out for every dollar of fresh inflow.
- This ratio increased to 70 cents during 2018–19 to 2021–22 and has since risen to its current elevated level, reflecting a growing imbalance between fresh capital inflows and associated outflows
|
For Prelims: Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), initial public offering (IPO), Current Account Deficit (CAD)
For Mains: GS III - Economy
|
|
Previous Year Questions
1. Both Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) and Foreign Institutional Investor (FII) are related to investment in a country. (UPSC CSE 2011)
Which one of the following statements best represents an important difference between the two?
A.FII helps bring better management skills and technology, while FDI only brings in capital
B.FII helps in increasing capital availability in general, while FDI only targets specific sectors C.FDI flows only into the secondary markets, while FII targets primary market
D.FII is considered to the more stable than FDI
Answer (B)
|
INDIA'S ENERGY SECURITY
India’s energy security concerns are increasing focus on converting agricultural residue, food waste, sewage sludge, and organic municipal waste into reliable and commercially viable energy solutions; technologies such as gasification and anaerobic digestion are emerging as critical pathways
2. Global energy supply uncertainty
- Global energy supply networks continue to experience instability, while fuel prices remain highly sensitive to international geopolitical and economic disturbances. For countries such as India, enhancing domestic energy security has therefore become increasingly critical.
- At the same time, as India explores large-scale and sustainable energy alternatives, a significant but underutilised resource already exists in the form of waste generated across the country.
- Massive quantities of agricultural residues, food waste, sewage sludge, and organic municipal waste are produced annually, yet a substantial portion is either inefficiently managed or left unused.
- This situation highlights the close connection between two pressing national concerns: energy security and waste management. Materials commonly viewed only as waste-disposal challenges can, with suitable technologies and infrastructure, be transformed into valuable sources of energy.
- The central issue is not the availability of raw resources, but whether India can establish efficient and scalable systems capable of converting waste into dependable and commercially sustainable energy solutions.
3. Waste and Energy
- India generates close to 750 million tonnes of agricultural biomass annually, out of which nearly 230 million metric tonnes is considered surplus biomass.
- If this excess biomass is effectively collected and processed, it could substantially reduce the country’s reliance on fossil fuels, with some projections indicating the potential to substitute almost one-third of fuel imports. However, transforming biomass into usable energy remains a challenging process.
- Unlike traditional fossil fuels, biomass lacks uniformity in its characteristics. Variations in moisture content, density, and ash composition differ widely among feedstocks, influencing combustion performance, transportation costs, emission levels, and operational efficiency in industries.
- Since most energy systems depend on consistent and reliable fuel quality, untreated biomass often falls short of these requirements.
- Consequently, increasing attention is being directed toward technologies capable of converting waste into cleaner, more efficient, and easier-to-handle forms of energy. In this context, processes such as gasification and anaerobic digestion are gaining growing significance.
- These technologies effectively serve as a link between raw waste materials and practical energy infrastructure.
- Rather than viewing waste merely as a low-value residue, they enable its transformation into commercially useful fuels and energy carriers that can be integrated into existing industrial and energy networks
- Gasification is especially suitable for processing dry biomass materials such as crop residues, husk, woody biomass, and other solid organic waste.
- Within a gasifier, the feedstock undergoes multiple stages including drying, pyrolysis, partial oxidation, and reduction.
- During this process, heat breaks down the biomass into gases, biochar, and tar compounds.
- A controlled and limited supply of oxygen is introduced — insufficient for full combustion but adequate to maintain chemical reactions involving carbon, steam, and carbon dioxide at temperatures ranging between 800°C and 1,000°C.
- The resulting product is syngas, a fuel mixture primarily composed of carbon monoxide, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide, along with smaller quantities of methane and other gases.
- Syngas is considered highly valuable because of its adaptability. It can be directly utilised for producing heat and electricity or further refined into renewable fuels such as methane, methanol, ethanol, and even hydrogen depending on industrial requirements.
- This versatility positions gasification as one of the most promising technologies in advanced bioenergy systems and explains its growing importance in the development of future clean-fuel ecosystems.
- In addition to energy production, gasification also generates biochar, a carbon-rich byproduct that can enhance soil fertility while contributing to carbon sequestration. The process further creates potential opportunities within emerging carbon credit markets.
- Therefore, the benefits of gasification extend beyond energy generation alone, supporting wider environmental sustainability and agricultural improvement objectives
- While gasification is best suited for dry forms of biomass, wet organic waste requires an alternative processing method. In this context, anaerobic digestion emerges as an important solution, particularly for handling sewage, food waste, animal manure, and various industrial organic waste streams.
- Under this process, microorganisms decompose organic matter in an oxygen-free environment, resulting in the production of biogas that primarily contains methane and carbon dioxide. Alongside biogas, the process also generates a nutrient-rich digestate, which can serve as a soil conditioner when properly managed.
- This makes anaerobic digestion highly applicable in urban waste-management systems, sewage treatment facilities, dairy farms, food-processing industries, industrial campuses, and large institutional kitchens where wet waste is generated regularly. On a smaller scale, the technology can also benefit rural and semi-urban areas.
- However, unlike thermal conversion technologies, anaerobic digestion relies on a stable and continuous biological process.
- Therefore, maintaining operational efficiency and ensuring uninterrupted energy output require a consistent and adequate supply of feedstock over the long term
- For India, the greater potential may lie not in selecting one waste-to-energy technology over another, but in combining them strategically.
- Gasification is most effective for processing dry waste, whereas anaerobic digestion performs better with wet organic waste.
- When integrated thoughtfully, these technologies offer a more comprehensive solution suited to the varied nature of India’s waste streams.
- Ensuring that the appropriate type of waste is matched with the correct technology and intended energy outcome is equally important. Using wet waste in gasifiers or feeding dry biomass into digesters can lower efficiency and create additional operational difficulties.
- Such a combined approach also supports the development of decentralised energy systems.
- India’s energy transition cannot depend solely on large centralised facilities; it also requires smaller distributed systems capable of serving rural industries, agro-processing hubs, MSMEs, and regions with high waste generation where transporting biomass across long distances becomes economically unviable.
- Localised systems can transform locally available waste into usable energy, thereby reducing fuel expenses while simultaneously improving waste management and energy accessibility.
- For this ecosystem to expand successfully, strong policy backing will be essential.
- Measures such as waste segregation at the source, investment in decentralised infrastructure, development of robust carbon markets, and long-term regulatory certainty will significantly shape the speed of adoption.
- Without effective segregation practices, both gasification and anaerobic digestion will struggle to operate at their optimal capacity. Likewise, uncertainty in policy frameworks often discourages investors and operators from making large-scale financial commitments
|
For Prelims: anaerobic digestion, microorganisms , Syngas , biochar, Sustainable Alternative Towards Affordable Transportation (SATAT)
For Mains: GS III - Science and Technology
|
|
Previous Year Questions
1.Consider the following statements: (2016)
Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only Answer (a)
|
GalaxEye Drishti Satellite
- Imaging satellites are typically fitted with either multi-spectral/hyper-spectral optical sensors or Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) systems. Both technologies are widely utilized for Earth observation purposes.
- Each of these imaging methods comes with certain drawbacks. Optical images produced through multi-spectral sensors are visually clear and easier to interpret, but their performance is affected during cloudy conditions or at night.
- In contrast, SAR technology can penetrate clouds and provide uninterrupted imaging in all weather conditions, though the resulting images are more complex and require expert analysis, much like X-ray scans.
- Optical and SAR sensors differ significantly in their design and mode of observation. Since they capture Earth from different viewing angles, a mismatch or parallax issue can occur. For example, when positioned side by side, an optical sensor may capture Bengaluru while the SAR sensor simultaneously records imagery from a different location such as Dubai. Additionally, differences in image acquisition timing can create temporal gaps, posing challenges for mission-critical operations.
- To overcome these limitations and produce clearer, more user-friendly satellite imagery, the Indian start-up GalaxEye developed the Drishti satellite.
- This satellite integrates both optical and SAR imaging systems on a single platform and synchronizes their operation to capture the same location simultaneously. As a result, users no longer need to manually align datasets collected from separate satellites.
- The Drishti satellite merges the visual clarity offered by optical imaging with the dependable all-weather capabilities of SAR technology.
- By combining both on a unified platform, it provides reliable, intuitive, and analysis-ready Earth observation data under all weather conditions. The company refers to this integrated innovation as Opto-SAR technology.
- According to the company, advanced AI-driven software operating both onboard the satellite and on the ground performs sub-pixel co-registration and jitter correction. These algorithms ensure that information from both sensors is accurately aligned and processed into a single, integrated dataset.
- This innovation is considered unique because it addresses challenges that are especially significant in tropical countries.
- Historically, most satellite companies have been based in Western nations, where weather conditions are relatively stable and skies are generally clearer.
- Unlike countries such as India, these regions face fewer problems related to persistent cloud cover, reducing the demand for such integrated imaging solution
|
DRISHTI system of Indian Railways
Although the name is similar, its purpose is entirely different, so it should not be confused with other technologies bearing the same title. Indian Railways is preparing to introduce an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven system called DRISHTI to strengthen the safety and security of freight train operations. The technology is intended to improve transparency, monitoring, and technological reliability within the freight protection framework. The AI-enabled Locking Monitoring System, known as DRISHTI, aims to replace conventional manual inspection methods, which are often labor-intensive, time-consuming, and inefficient, particularly for long-distance freight rakes operating under constantly changing conditions. |
- Skyroot Aerospace is expected to emerge as the first private Indian firm to launch an orbital rocket, named Vikram-1. This multi-stage launch vehicle uses a combination of solid and liquid propulsion systems and is capable of carrying satellites weighing up to 350 kg into Low Earth Orbit (LEO).
— A key feature that distinguishes Vikram-1 is its construction using carbon composite materials instead of conventional metals. In addition, the rocket incorporates a fully indigenous 3D-printed engine, which significantly simplifies manufacturing and assembly while reducing production time and costs.
— Skyroot had earlier become the first private Indian company to conduct a successful single-stage sub-orbital launch in 2022, preceding another private player, Agnikul Cosmos. A sub-orbital mission travels at speeds below orbital velocity, allowing the vehicle to enter outer space without achieving a stable orbit around Earth.
- Pixxel announced on May 4 a collaboration with Sarvam AI to create India’s first orbital data-centre satellite, known as The Pathfinder.
— Scheduled to enter orbit by the end of 2026, the 200-kg satellite will carry advanced GPUs (Graphics Processing Units) that will support the training and inference functions of Sarvam AI’s models.
— In contrast to traditional satellite computing systems that depend on low-power processors designed mainly for operational survival, Pathfinder will employ hardware comparable to the advanced data-centre infrastructure used on Earth for cutting-edge AI applications.
- In 2024, Agnikul Cosmos achieved a milestone by successfully launching its maiden sub-orbital test vehicle, powered by the world’s first single-piece 3D-printed rocket engine. The engine, named Agnilet, operates using sub-cooled oxygen as propellant.
— The mission, titled “Agnibaan – SOrTeD” (Sub-Orbital Technology Demonstrator), was launched from “Dhanush,” India’s first privately developed launch pad established by Agnikul. The launch also marked India’s first rocket mission powered by a semi-cryogenic engine.
4. IN-SPACe
- In 2020, the Government of India established IN-SPACe and later introduced the Indian Space Policy 2023 to encourage wider participation of private companies in the country’s space sector.
- IN-SPACe operates as an autonomous, single-window nodal agency under the Department of Space (DoS), functioning independently to support and oversee non-governmental participation in space activities.
- The organisation serves both as a facilitator and a regulatory body. It acts as a bridge between ISRO and private enterprises while also evaluating the most effective ways to utilise India’s space assets and expand space-related operations.
- According to ISRO, IN-SPACe is entrusted with the responsibility of promoting, enabling, authorising, and supervising a range of activities undertaken by non-governmental entities. These include the development of launch vehicles and satellites, delivery of space-based services, access to infrastructure and facilities managed by DoS/ISRO, and the establishment of new space infrastructure.
- In 2025, the government finalised a revised draft of the Space Activities Bill with the objective of expanding India’s space economy to 44 billion dollars by 2033. Out of this projected market size, around 11 billion dollars is expected to come from exports. By comparison, India’s space sector was estimated to have a market value of 8.4 billion dollars in 2022.
- It refers to a network of satellites equipped with advanced GPUs similar to those used in ground-based data centres. Unlike conventional satellites that primarily transmit data back to Earth, these satellites are capable of training and operating AI models directly in orbit.
- This enables them to perform computationally intensive tasks that go beyond the capabilities of the low-power edge processors typically used in satellites for functions such as data or signal compression.
- On Earth, edge computing involves processing data closer to its source instead of relying entirely on centralised cloud infrastructure. The same principle, when applied in space, forms the basis of space-based computing systems.
- Pixxel is developing the Pathfinder mission as a single-satellite technology demonstrator aimed at evaluating whether data-centre-grade hardware can operate effectively and reliably within the extreme thermal and environmental conditions of Low Earth Orbit (LEO)
- GPU processors powered through solar energy generate significant amounts of heat during operation. Although outer space is extremely cold, it cannot naturally absorb this heat efficiently because space is a vacuum.
- In the absence of air, convection — the process through which warm air carries away heat from terrestrial servers — cannot occur.
- As a result, a GPU operating in orbit behaves like an enclosed oven, unable to dissipate excess thermal energy through airflow.
- To address this challenge, satellites rely on radiative cooling systems. Heat is transferred through loops filled with ammonia to extendable radiator panels, which then release the energy into space in the form of infrared radiation. The history of human space missions demonstrates how critical and unforgiving thermal management in space can be.
- Another major challenge is radiation exposure, which has influenced the design of nearly all long-duration space missions.
- High-energy cosmic radiation can cause “bit flips,” where computer data changes unexpectedly, and can also lead to gradual deterioration of semiconductor components over time.
- Although radiation-hardened chips are commonly used in spacecraft, they generally remain technologically behind commercial GPUs by several years.
- Power management presents an additional difficulty, since satellites must store sufficient energy to function during eclipse phases when sunlight is unavailable.
- Furthermore, maintenance or repairs in orbit are nearly impossible without specialised robotic systems, making built-in redundancy an essential aspect of spacecraft design from the beginning
|
For Prelims: IN-SPACe, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), Low Earth Orbit (LEO)
For Mains: GS III - Science and Technology
|
COMPOSITE BACKWARDNESS INDEX (CBI)
- The Composite Backwardness Index (CBI) is a method used by governments and expert committees to identify how socially, educationally, and economically disadvantaged a particular community or group is when compared to the rest of society.
- Instead of looking at only one factor such as income or literacy, the index combines several indicators together to measure “backwardness” in a more comprehensive way. That is why it is called a composite index.
- In India, the idea of such an index became important mainly in the context of identifying Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBCs) for reservation policies and welfare measures.
- Different commissions and state governments have used versions of a backwardness index to determine which communities require special support under the constitutional principle of social justice.
- The basic logic behind the CBI is that backwardness is not caused by a single problem. A community may suffer from low literacy, poor representation in government jobs, lack of land ownership, low income levels, inadequate housing, poor access to education, social discrimination, or low participation in professional occupations.
- If only one indicator is used, the real condition of the community may not be fully understood. Therefore, the index combines multiple indicators and assigns weightage to them.
- Each indicator is given marks or weightage. After calculating the total score, communities with higher backwardness scores are identified as more disadvantaged
|
For example, a backwardness index may include factors such as:
|
- One of the most well-known uses of such an approach in India was by the Mandal Commission (Second Backward Classes Commission) established in 1979 under the chairmanship of B.P. Mandal.
- The commission developed a method to identify Other Backward Classes (OBCs) using social, educational, and economic indicators. It used multiple criteria and assigned points to determine the relative backwardness of communities.
- This became the basis for extending reservation benefits to OBCs in central government jobs and educational institutions.
- The importance of the Composite Backwardness Index lies in making welfare policies more evidence-based and objective. Rather than relying only on political demands or historical perceptions, the index attempts to scientifically measure deprivation.
- It also helps governments prioritize development schemes and affirmative action policies for communities that genuinely need support.
- However, the CBI is not free from criticism. Some scholars argue that backwardness cannot be fully captured through numerical indicators because social discrimination and historical exclusion are complex realities.
- Others argue that the data used for calculating the index may become outdated over time, especially since caste-wise socio-economic data in India is limited.
- There are also debates about the weightage given to different indicators and whether economic criteria should receive greater importance than caste-based disadvantages.
- Despite these debates, the Composite Backwardness Index remains an important tool in India’s social justice framework because it provides a structured mechanism to identify disadvantaged groups and support inclusive development
- A caste and socio-economic survey carried out in Telangana has highlighted deep disparities among various communities in the state. The findings, prepared by the Independent Expert Working Group on Telangana’s Socio, Economic, Educational, Employment, Political and Caste (SEEEPC) Survey, were made public on April 15. The survey itself was undertaken in 2024.
- According to the report, Backward Classes (BCs), excluding Muslim minorities, represent the largest social category in the state, accounting for 46.3% of the population. When combined with Scheduled Castes (17.4%) and Scheduled Tribes (10.4%), these groups together constitute 74.1% of Telangana’s population. Muslim minorities account for 12.6%, while Other Castes comprise 13.3%.
- Even though BCs, SCs, and STs form a majority, the survey revealed that 135 communities — including 69 BC castes, 41 SC groups, and 25 ST communities — remain more disadvantaged than earlier estimates suggested.
- In contrast, the OC category, despite making up only 13.3% of the population, enjoys a dominant presence in private-sector employment and higher education, receives comparatively better salaries, occupies larger houses, and generally experiences a superior standard of living.
- Since Telangana was formed as a separate state in June 2014, the government has made substantial investments in the education sector, with a strong emphasis on expanding English-medium learning.
- Programmes such as Mana Vooru Mana Badi focused on improving school infrastructure, introducing digital classrooms with English-medium instruction, and providing essential facilities like toilets and safe drinking water. Teacher training initiatives were also strengthened.
- These measures have led to a major generational transformation over the last decade. Among individuals in the 6–29 age group, 60.5% are now studying in English-medium institutions, whereas 35.3% continue to receive education in Telugu medium. This shift is especially visible in urban centres and among economically better-off sections of society
- Several states have argued that representation in Parliament should not be determined solely by population figures, but should also take into account a state’s contribution to the national economy.
- In a similar manner, social justice policies may need to consider the actual extent of backwardness experienced by a caste, rather than relying only on its numerical strength. While economic contribution can be quantified relatively easily, assessing the degree of caste-based backwardness is far more complex.
- To address this challenge, an independent expert panel appointed by the Government of Telangana designed an evidence-based framework known as the Composite Backwardness Index (CBI) to scientifically assess the relative backwardness of different caste groups.
- The framework evaluated 242 caste communities using data collected from nearly 35 million individuals through the caste survey, with each individual mapped across 75 categories of information.
- Since backwardness is a relative social condition, the index seeks to compare whether one community is placed at a greater disadvantage than another. The broader objective of social justice, therefore, is to enable historically marginalised groups to bridge these inequalities.
- Under this methodology, all 242 castes — comprising 133 BCs, 59 SCs, 32 STs, and 18 General category groups — were assessed on 42 diverse indicators.
- These included factors such as dependence on daily wage labour, access to English-medium education, availability of toilets, ownership of irrigated land, and experiences of discrimination at religious places.
- Based on these indicators, a relative backwardness score was calculated using quartile distribution techniques.
- The study is far more detailed than the framework used by the Mandal Commission in its 1980 report, which relied on only 11 indicators.
- The findings statistically confirm long-standing social observations: Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes are nearly three times more backward than General category groups, while Backward Classes are about 2.7 times more disadvantaged.
- The report also demonstrates that levels of deprivation vary significantly even among historically oppressed communities, providing measurable and scientific validation for these differences.
- Within the 133 BC communities studied, 69 were found to be more backward than the state average, whereas 64 performed relatively better. Among Scheduled Castes, 18 out of 59 communities were placed above the state average, while seven of the 32 Scheduled Tribe groups were similarly better positioned.
- However, these comparatively advanced groups constitute only a very small share of their overall populations. In population terms, around 99% of STs, 97% of SCs, and 71% of BCs continue to remain more backward than the state average.
- The report further concludes that access to English-medium and private education has emerged as the strongest factor influencing social advancement, outweighing even land or asset ownership.
- Communities such as Gouds, Goldsmiths, and Christians may possess limited land resources, yet perform better because of stronger access to private education.
- In contrast, groups like the Lambadi tribes, along with Mudiraj and Valmiki communities, may own relatively larger areas of irrigated land but still remain socially disadvantaged due to weaker educational access.
- The findings underline that backwardness is shaped by multiple interconnected factors, including birth-based inequalities, regional conditions, and overall living standards
|
For Prelims: Current events of national and international importance
For Mains: General Studies I: population and associated issues and Social empowerment
|
|
Previous Year Questions
1.Despite comprehensive policies for equity and social justice, underprivileged sections are not yet getting the full benefits of affirmative action envisaged by the Constitution. Comment. (2024)
2.Why is caste identity in India both fluid and static? (2023) 3.“Caste system is assuming new identities and associational forms. Hence caste system cannot be eradicated in India.” Comment. (2018) |
