Current Affair

Back
DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS, 18 MARCH 2026

ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ACT, 1955

 
 
 
1. Context
 
As the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz exposed the vulnerability of India’s supply chain for cooking gas, the majority of which is imported, the Union government invoked the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. While long-term steps are needed to diversify and reduce reliance on global suppliers and expand strategic reserves, the Act is a crucial emergency tool for now. It allows the Centre to direct refiners to boost domestic LPG production, prioritise household consumption, and regulate the allocation of natural gas.
 
 
2. What is the Essential Commodities Act, 1955?
 
 
  • The Act authorizes the Union government to regulate the production, supply, and distribution of key commodities, such as medicines, fertilizers, food items, edible oils, fuels, and seeds.
  • According to Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, the government may issue directives to ensure adequate supply, promote increased production of essential goods, and guarantee their fair distribution so that they remain accessible to the public at reasonable prices.
  • It also has the authority to fix prices and stock limits, restrict certain sales, regulate storage, transportation, and distribution, and take measures to curb hoarding and black-marketing.
  • In recent years, the Act has been used to address shortages of commodities such as wheat, sugar, and pulses. It was also enforced during the COVID-19 lockdown to curb hoarding, profiteering, and black-market activities involving several essential goods
 

Essential commodities are goods that are necessary for daily life and whose shortage can affect the public. Under the Act, the Central Government can declare any commodity as essential.

Common examples include:

  • Food grains (rice, wheat)

  • Pulses

  • Edible oils

  • Sugar

  • Petroleum products

  • Fertilizers

  • Drugs

 
 
 
3. Why is this law invoked now?
 
 
  • Amid military strikes by the United States and Israel, Iran has responded by launching attacks on oil-producing countries in the Persian Gulf that host U.S. military bases and by targeting vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz.
  • Although nearly one-fifth of the world’s oil trade moves through this strategic maritime route, the immediate concern for Indian consumers has been the potential disruption in the supply of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG), commonly used as cooking fuel.
  • Government initiatives such as the Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana significantly expanded LPG access in India, raising household coverage from around 62% in 2016 to almost universal access today.
  • However, domestic production has not grown at the same pace as demand. In 2024–25, Indian refineries produced about 12.8 million metric tonnes of LPG, meeting only around 41% of the country’s annual requirement of 31.3 million tonnes, according to data from the Petroleum Ministry.
  • The remaining demand is met through imports, nearly 90% of which pass through the Strait of Hormuz.
  • Apart from LPG, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) is also used in Indian households through pipeline networks, as well as for transportation and various commercial applications.
  • Of India’s daily gas consumption of roughly 189 million metric standard cubic meters, about 52% is produced domestically.
  • Meanwhile, approximately one-quarter of the total demand is satisfied through imports from the Persian Gulf
 
 
4. How does order affect LPG Production?
 
 
  • On March 5, the government instructed all oil refineries across India to divert their propane and butane outputs toward LPG production instead of using them for petrochemical manufacturing.
  • A follow-up directive issued on March 9 expanded the scope of this order to include oil refineries and petrochemical units located in Special Economic Zones (SEZs).
  • It further clarified that propylene, butene, and other components from the C3 and C4 hydrocarbon streams must also be utilised solely for LPG production.
  • The directive applies not only to public sector refiners such as Indian Oil Corporation, Bharat Petroleum, and Hindustan Petroleum, but also to other entities including Chennai Petroleum Corporation, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation, and Numaligarh Refinery Limited.
  • In addition, private-sector refiners like Reliance Industries and Nayara Energy have also been brought under this order.
  • According to the government, these measures have already boosted domestic LPG production by about 25%. Nevertheless, a significant portion of the country’s demand—roughly half—still needs to be met through imports.
  • The directive also mandates that all LPG output be supplied exclusively to Indian Oil Corporation, Bharat Petroleum, and Hindustan Petroleum, which have been instructed to prioritise distribution of cylinders to household consumers.
  • As a result, reduced supply to commercial establishments has led several restaurants, hostels, and hotels to temporarily close or scale down their operations
 
 
5. Regulation of Natural Gas Supply
 
 
  • The directive issued on March 9 regarding natural gas does not alter production levels; instead, it introduces a priority-based system for allocating gas supplies, superseding existing contractual arrangements.
  • Under this framework, the highest priority is assigned to piped natural gas supplied to households, compressed natural gas used in transportation, gas required for LPG production, and fuel for pipeline compressors.
  • These sectors will receive supplies equivalent to 100% of their average consumption during the previous six months, subject to overall availability.
  • Fertilizer producers will be allocated about 70% of their usual requirements, although this proportion may be revised if ongoing conflict continues to disrupt supply chains during the kharif sowing season.
  • Meanwhile, sectors such as tea processing, manufacturing, and other industries will receive up to 80% of their typical supply.
  • Certain petrochemical units operated by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation, GAIL, and Reliance Industries may experience partial or complete reductions in liquefied natural gas (LNG) supplies. Additionally, natural gas allocations to oil refineries are expected to fall to around 65% of their normal consumption levels
 
For Prelims: Essential Commodities, liquefied natural gas (LNG), Special Economic Zones (SEZs)
 
For Mains: GS II - Policy and Governance
 
Previous Year Questions
 

1.Which of the following statements is/are correct about the Strait of Hormuz?

  1. It lies between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman.

  2. It is strategically important for global oil trade.

  3. It connects the Arabian Sea directly with the Mediterranean Sea.

Select the correct answer using the code below:

(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 2 and 3 only
(c) 1 and 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3

Answer: (a)

2.With reference to Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), consider the following statements:

  1. LNG is natural gas that has been cooled to a liquid state.

  2. LNG occupies much less volume than natural gas in gaseous form.

  3. LNG is mainly transported through pipelines across countries.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1 only
(b) 1 and 2 only
(c) 2 and 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3

Answer: (b)

3.Consider the following statements:

  1. India imports a significant share of its natural gas requirement.

  2. Natural gas is used in power generation, fertilizers, and transport.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2

Answer: (c)

 
Source: The Hindu
 
 
 

BRICS SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION

 
 
 
1. Context
 

BRICS functions as a collaborative force aimed at establishing a multipolar world system. Cooperation in science, technology and innovation has been a key agenda for the grouping and has expanded over the years to include socially relevant areas such as energy, water, health and the environment

 

2. About BRICS

 

  • The BRICS bloc—consisting of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—represents a major global coalition, distinguished by its significant share in world GDP, strong scientific and technological capabilities, abundant natural resources, and large population base.
  • Over time, it has emerged as an influential platform on the global stage, articulating the perspectives of nations that aim to counterbalance Western dominance. The grouping works collectively toward promoting a multipolar international order.
  • While its role in global financial and macroeconomic discussions is well acknowledged, its collaboration in science, technology, and innovation (STI) has received comparatively limited attention.
  • In an era where international scientific partnerships are increasingly shaped by geopolitical rivalries, techno-nationalism, and strategic restrictions such as sanctions and export controls, BRICS plays an important role in shaping the global STI ecosystem.
  • The platform enables member countries to align their approaches, strengthen their collective bargaining power in global economic governance, and shape development financing through mechanisms such as the New Development Bank.
  • BRICS nations also hold considerable importance in global trade, energy supply, and the provision of critical natural resources. The introduction of BRICS+ in 2022 marked a shift toward greater inclusivity, aiming to enhance cooperation among countries of the Global South and reduce reliance on external technological systems.
  • This initiative reflects a growing effort to build shared capabilities through structured programmes. The grouping has further expanded to include countries such as Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the UAE, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and Iran
 
3. Science, technology, and innovation (STI) Collaboration
 
 
  • Science, technology, and innovation (STI) cooperation has been embedded in the BRICS agenda since its inception. It gained formal recognition in 2011 and was later strengthened through engagements among senior officials and BRICS Ministers responsible for STI.
  • A landmark memorandum of understanding in 2015 elevated STI to a central strategic priority, establishing an institutional structure and operational direction for joint research and capacity-building.
  • This framework has since broadened collaboration, enabling member states to utilise their complementary strengths to tackle common developmental issues and push the boundaries of advanced research.
  • The first BRICS Action Plan for Innovation Cooperation (2017–2020) assigned the Science, Technology, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship Partnership (STIEP) Working Group the responsibility of executing multiple initiatives.
  • These efforts promoted entrepreneurship ecosystems, encouraged participation of youth and women in STI, and supported technology transfer along with business incubation.
  • Over time, the grouping has shifted its focus from basic scientific collaboration toward innovation-driven initiatives and practical technology transfer.
  • These evolving priorities are reflected in annual ministerial declarations, where BRICS Ministers of Science, Technology, and Innovation convene to endorse strategic directions.
  • Within each country, designated nodal agencies manage coordination, invite research proposals, and compile project pipelines during their presidency.
  • For instance, during India’s leadership, institutions such as the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) and the Department of Biotechnology (DBT) play a central coordinating role.
  • Recent initiatives highlight a strong push toward innovation-led and technology-enabled ecosystems.
  • Platforms like iBRICS and the BRICS Technology Transfer Centre (TTC) illustrate this direction, with the TTC contributing to policy development and institutional connectivity for cross-border technology commercialisation.
  • However, despite these advances, large-scale commercial deployment of such technologies remains limited.
  • The scope of joint research has also evolved, moving beyond foundational science to address socially relevant sectors such as energy, water, healthcare, and environmental sustainability.
  • The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated this transition, bringing heightened attention to public health systems, vaccine development, biosecurity, and digital healthcare.
  • More recent collaborations have incorporated areas such as high-performance computing (HPC), advanced materials, information and communication technologies (ICT), and space applications, alongside a growing emphasis on artificial intelligence and data-driven science.
  • Although working groups align with shared developmental priorities, progress has been uneven across sectors.
  • Notable advancements are visible in ICT and HPC, including initiatives like the BRICS Institute of Future Networks, as well as in space collaboration following a 2021 intergovernmental agreement.
  • In contrast, domains requiring extensive infrastructure or long-term investment—such as mega-science projects and ocean or polar research—have progressed more slowly.
  • The expansion of BRICS has further strengthened its role as an inclusive platform for knowledge sharing and collaborative innovation.
  • The 2025 Declaration on Artificial Intelligence marked a significant shift by elevating AI to a core pillar of multilateral governance, emphasising principles of inclusivity, equity, and development orientation.
  • While the 2021–2024 Action Plan concentrated on building networks and thematic cooperation, subsequent strategies aim to scale up projects with greater real-world impact, particularly in biotechnology, climate technologies, industrial innovation, and AI.
  • With India set to assume the 2026 Presidency under the theme “Building for Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and Sustainability,” BRICS is poised to deepen scientific collaboration.
  • The focus will be on leveraging its expanded membership to enhance collective capacities and address pressing challenges such as the digital divide, public health emergencies, and climate resilience.
  • However, engagement from newer members has been uneven; among the latest entrants, only Egypt and Iran participated in the most recent call for proposals.
  • Additionally, the China-BRICS Research Centre on New Quality Productive Forces, recently established in Beijing, is expected to serve as a key platform for academic exchange and technological collaboration

 

4. Concerns and Consequences

 

  • When compared with countries such as South Korea, the National Innovation Systems (NIS) of BRICS nations reveal a mixed picture of capabilities and gaps.
  • In particular, gross domestic expenditure on research and development (GERD) remains relatively low across most members, with China being a notable exception.
  • Studies indicate a substantial gap between BRICS countries and South Korea across multiple innovation metrics, with all members except China needing significant progress.
  • With the transition to BRICS+, it becomes equally important to evaluate and strengthen the innovation ecosystems of the newly inducted members. Enhancing these systems could become a key priority over the coming decade, with the possibility of extending such improvements across the wider Global South.
  • As highlighted by Stanford University scholar Irina Dezhina, the diversity among new members—both in terms of economic advancement and scientific capabilities—poses challenges in aligning priorities.
  • This diversity may require BRICS+ to promote targeted bilateral or “paired” collaborations between specific countries.
  • Lessons can also be drawn from the European Union (EU), which offers a broad range of STI programmes, whereas BRICS currently provides relatively limited opportunities.
  • Moreover, although competition for available funding is high, the overall pool of resources remains constrained.
  • Scholars argue that BRICS initiatives must evolve qualitatively to effectively address complex global challenges.
  • At present, however, systematic research on STI cooperation within BRICS is limited, and there is no structured mechanism for continuous assessment and evidence-based policy inputs for member states
 
5. Way Forward
 
 

Despite notable progress in collaboration, concerns remain about whether the existing institutional arrangements are adequate for future demands. A major limitation is the absence of a permanent institutional framework to oversee STI cooperation. The current model—where leadership rotates annually with the presidency—is not well-suited for long-term planning. One possible solution is to adopt a model similar to the EU’s Horizon Programme by creating a centralised Secretariat responsible for managing funds, issuing research calls, tracking implementation, and evaluating outcomes.

Additionally, launching a few long-term mega-science projects could significantly deepen cooperation among members. Over time, the scope of STI collaboration should extend beyond project funding to include research on governance frameworks and the broader societal and economic implications of emerging technologies within BRICS+. Such efforts would improve coordination in international negotiations and strengthen institutional capacity for STI governance.

In conclusion, although BRICS has made considerable strides in STI cooperation since 2015 despite various constraints, substantial improvements are still needed. Strengthening the framework to make it more responsive, efficient, and credible will enhance the group’s global standing. As the incoming chair of BRICS+ in 2026, India is well-positioned to steer this transformation

 

 
For Prelims: BRICS, Global South Unity, Western Influence, New Development Bank (NDB), and Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA).
For Mains: 1. Discuss the Implications of BRICS' Expansion for India's Geopolitical Positioning and Influence within the Alliance.
2. Analyze India's Role in Shaping BRICS' Membership Criteria and Its Strategic Significance in the Expanded Coalition.
 

Previous year Questions

1. With reference to a grouping of countries known as BRICS, consider the following statements: (UPSC 2014)
1. The First Summit of BRICS was held in Rio de Janeiro in 2009.
2. South Africa was the last to join the BRICS grouping.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
A. 1 only
B. 2 only
C. Both 1 and 2
D. Neither 1 nor 2
Answer: B
 
2. With reference to BRIC countries, consider the following statements: (UPSC 2010)
1. At present, China's GDP is more than the combined GDP of all three other countries.
2. China's population is more than the combined population of any two other countries.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
A. 1 only
B. 2 only
C. Both 1 and 2
D. Neither 1 nor 2
Answer: A
 
3. The 'Fortaleza Declaration', recently in the news, is related to the affairs of  (UPSC 2015)
A. ASEAN
B. BRICS
C. OECD
D. WTO
Answer: B
Source: The Hindu

 

 NAVIC SATELLITE

 
 

1. Context 

 India’s indigenous navigation satellite system—Navigation with Indian Constellation (NavIC)—has suffered a major setback with one of its four operational satellites reporting a failure “at the end of 10 years since its launch”, according to Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) officials.

2. Key Takeaways

  • Each of the seven satellites currently in the Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System (IRNSS) Constellation, operationally named NavIC, weighed much less around 1, 425 kg at liftoff.
  • They all rode the lighter Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV), ISRO's workhorse launch rocket.
  • The last IRNSS Satellite, IRNSS-1I, was launched in April 2018 to replace an older, partially defunct satellite in the constellation.
  • IRNSS-1I was ISRO's ninth satellite for the NavIC constellation but is considered to be the eighth because the IRNSS-1H launched eight months earlier in August 2017 and originally intended to replace the older satellite was lost after the heat shield of the payload failed to open on time.
Image source: ISRO

3. About the second generation NavIC satellite

  • The second-generation satellite christened NVS-01, the first of ISRO's NVS series of payloads is heavier. Other than that:
    Atomic Clock: The satellite will have a Rubidium atomic clock onboard, a significant technology developed by India.
  • The Space-qualified Rubidium Atomic clock indigenously developed by Space Application Centre-Ahmedabad is an important technology which only a handful of countries possess.
  • L1 signals for better use in wearable devices: The Second-generation satellites will send signals in a third frequency, L1, besides the L5 and S frequency signals that the existing satellites provide, increasing interoperability with other satellite-based navigation systems.
  • The L1 frequency is among the most commonly used in the Global Positioning System (GPS) and will increase the use of the regional navigation system in wearable devices and personal trackers that use low-power, single-frequency chips.
  • Longer mission life:  The second-generation satellites will also have a longer mission life of more than 12 years. The existing satellites have a mission life of 10 years.

4. Significance of the atomic clock on board the NVS-01 payload

  • Several of the existing satellites stopped providing location data after their onboard atomic clocks failed this was the main reason for the launch of the replacement satellite in 2018.
  • Since a satellite-based positioning system determines the location of objects by accurately measuring the time it takes for a signal to travel to and back from it using the atomic clocks on board, the failure of clocks means the satellites are no longer able to provide accurate locations.
  • Currently, only four IRNSS satellites can provide location services, according to ISRO officials.
  • The other satellites can only be used for messaging services such as providing disaster warnings or potential fishing zone messages for fishermen.

5. The age of the satellites

  • This is the second major concern, besides the failing atomic clocks.
  • IRNSS-1A was launched into orbit on July 1, 2013, and the 1B and 1C satellites were launched the following year.
  • 1A is almost defunct- the failed 1H mission of 2018 was intended to replace this satellite and all the three oldest satellites in the constellation are close to the end of their 10-year mission lives.
  • At least three new satellites must be put into orbit to keep the seven-satellite constellation fully functional.

6. NAvIC constellation 

  • ISRO has been criticised by experts for not focussing on the development of the user segment until very late in the life of some of the satellites in the constellation.
  • No receivers were developed for the NavIC system, even though the satellites were sending signals.
    A 2018 report by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India said that even though the Cabinet cleared funding of Rs 200 crores to develop user receivers in 2006, work on the project started only in March 2017, by which time seven launches had already taken place.
  • The receivers have now been developed and NavIC is in use for projects like public vehicle safety, power grid synchronisation, real-time train information systems and fishermen's safety.
  • Other upcoming initiatives such as common alert protocol-based emergency warning, time dissemination, geodetic network, and unmanned aerial vehicles are in the process of adopting the NavIC system.
  • Some cell phone chipsets such as the ones built by Qualcomm and Media Tek integrated NavIC receivers in 2019.
  • The Ministry of Electronics and IT is in talks with smartphone companies to urge them to make their handsets NavIC compatible.

7. Advantage of having a regional navigation system

  • India is the only country that has a regional satellite-based navigation system.
  • There are four global satellite-based navigation systems the American GPS, the Russian GLONASS (GLObalnaya NAvigatsionnnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema), the European Galileo and the Chinese Beidou.
  • Japan has a four-satellite system that can augment GPS signals over the country, similar to India's GAGAN (GPS Aided GEO Augmented Navigation).
  • Once fully operational with ground stations outside India for better triangulation of signals NavIC open signals will be accurate up to 5 meters and restricted signals will be even more accurate.
  • GPS signals by contrast are accurate up to around 20 meters. Work is underway to set up ground stations in Japan, France and Russia.
  • NavIC provides coverage over the Indian landmass and up to a radius of 1, 500 km around it.
  • In this region, NavIC signals will likely be available in even hard-to-reach areas.
  • Unlike GPS, NavIC uses satellites in high geo-stationery orbit the satellites move at a constant speed relative to Earth, so they are always looking over the same region on Earth.
  • NavIC signals come to India at a 90-degree angle, making it easier for them to reach devices located even in congested areas, dense forests or mountains.
  • GPS Signals are received over India at an angle.
  • With the use of NavIC picking up, the government has been looking at the possibility of increasing the coverage area of the system.
For Prelims: NavIC, Indian Space Research Organisation, GSLV, PSLV, IRNSS, GLONASS, GPS, GAGAN, Galileo, Beidou, 
For Mains: 
1.  What is NavIC? Explain the advantage of having a regional navigation system. (250 Words)
 
 
Previous Year Questions
 
1. With reference to the Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System (IRNSS), consider the following statements: (UPSC 2018)
1. IRNSS has three satellites in geostationary and four satellites in geosynchronous orbits.
2. IRNSS covers entire India and about 5500 sq. km beyond its borders.
3. India will have its own satellite navigation system with full global coverage by the middle of 2019.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct? 
A. 1 only     B. 1 and 2 only     C.  2 and 3 only        D. None
 
Answer: A
 
2. Full form of NavIC is : (CGPSC 2022) 
A. Navigation without International Control
B. Navigation with Indian Constellation
C. Navigation with Indian Coastal
D. Navigation with Indian Cooperation
 
Answer: B
 
3. ISRO is related to (SSC JE EE  2020) 
A. space research
B. agricultural research
C. seed research
D. marine research
 
Answer: A
 
4. With reference to India's satellite launch vehicles, consider the following statements:  (UPSC  2018) 
1. PSLVs launch the satellites useful for Earth resources monitoring whereas GSLVs are designed mainly to launch communication satellites.
2. Satellites launched by PSLV appear to remain permanently fixed in the same position in the sky, as viewed from a particular location on Earth.
3. GSLV Mk III is a four- staged launch vehicle with the first and third stages using solid rocket motors; and the second and fourth stages using liquid rocket engines.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct? 
A. 1 only                  B. 2 and 3             C. 1 and 2                    D.  3 only
 
Answer: A
 
5. In which of the following areas can GPS technology be used? (UPSC 2018)
1. Mobile phone operations
2. Banking operations
3. Controlling the power grids
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
A. 1 only    B. 2 and 3 only   C.  1 and 3 only      D.  1, 2 and 3
 
Answer: D
 
 Source: The Indian Express
 

Share to Social